I have two acts of business to take care of in this post: an explanation of my use of "mom" in the blog, and an update on the progress of Squiver.
1. I have received comments from a few out there that it's confusing when I reify my audience into a "mom" position. So this will be the hitherforth heretofore & henceforth explanation of my idiosyncratic usage of mom, so those of you who are concerned, continue reading; those of you who get it and don't care, scroll down to point 2.
When someone is small-time, s/he uses her/his immediate social sphere of individuals and groups for support, reflection, and motivation, and although it's not always the case, this immediate circle is often filled with family and close friends. In this initial, insecure phase of creation, the person in question obtains the status of a loser, a square, a pathetic creature. In fact, emotional reliance on that circle, whether it consists of family or not, connotes cultural no-nos like being 35 and living with your mom; it's security, dependence, teet-sucking, etc. at its worst. So, being thoughtful, insecure, and a bit more self-aware than other bloggers, I decided to contain my audience into the term of "mom." This is because the Mother is an extreme version of the inner-sphere of warm blankets and tickle fights; it is a symbol that captures and suggests the ultimate loser'ness: the Mom is the first & the closest to the dot in the middle of the circle that represents the Me. Therefore, to rely on the Mom when by "mom" I mean "my audience," I am poking fun at (myself) the ego-centric and self-consumed bloggers out there who need their audiences the way a loser needs his mother to reassure him that he isn't a sorry excuse of a mammal. In fact, moms are notorious for listening to and nodding at the boring, endless rhetoric of their son/daughter, much the same way an audience can hang on the every stupid word of the many ridiculous bloggers out there. Including Squiversphere.
2. Texts are compiled, advertisers are getting gotten this week, logo is complete, ad system is settled upon, and Oct. 3rd is the date Squiver 1.1 will be handed over to the printer in a ceremony of much pomp and circumstance. With the help of my Artistic Director and the INTERN, the staff of Squiver has decided that we will hack off the complex limbs of this beast of a publication and keep the simple, soothing torso. In other words, I'm going back to the basics: I'm re-adopting the original vision of the magazine: a basic, short, cheap-to-print, and colorless publication distributed to art-centric organizations in the Boulder area. This publication will feature a few well-known writers, a guest writer, and a heap of local, philosophically inclined folk writing their perceptions of contemporary American culture. It will also be full of B&W photos. Simple, yes? Yes.
Mom, thanks for listening, you're the best.
1. I have received comments from a few out there that it's confusing when I reify my audience into a "mom" position. So this will be the hitherforth heretofore & henceforth explanation of my idiosyncratic usage of mom, so those of you who are concerned, continue reading; those of you who get it and don't care, scroll down to point 2.
When someone is small-time, s/he uses her/his immediate social sphere of individuals and groups for support, reflection, and motivation, and although it's not always the case, this immediate circle is often filled with family and close friends. In this initial, insecure phase of creation, the person in question obtains the status of a loser, a square, a pathetic creature. In fact, emotional reliance on that circle, whether it consists of family or not, connotes cultural no-nos like being 35 and living with your mom; it's security, dependence, teet-sucking, etc. at its worst. So, being thoughtful, insecure, and a bit more self-aware than other bloggers, I decided to contain my audience into the term of "mom." This is because the Mother is an extreme version of the inner-sphere of warm blankets and tickle fights; it is a symbol that captures and suggests the ultimate loser'ness: the Mom is the first & the closest to the dot in the middle of the circle that represents the Me. Therefore, to rely on the Mom when by "mom" I mean "my audience," I am poking fun at (myself) the ego-centric and self-consumed bloggers out there who need their audiences the way a loser needs his mother to reassure him that he isn't a sorry excuse of a mammal. In fact, moms are notorious for listening to and nodding at the boring, endless rhetoric of their son/daughter, much the same way an audience can hang on the every stupid word of the many ridiculous bloggers out there. Including Squiversphere.
2. Texts are compiled, advertisers are getting gotten this week, logo is complete, ad system is settled upon, and Oct. 3rd is the date Squiver 1.1 will be handed over to the printer in a ceremony of much pomp and circumstance. With the help of my Artistic Director and the INTERN, the staff of Squiver has decided that we will hack off the complex limbs of this beast of a publication and keep the simple, soothing torso. In other words, I'm going back to the basics: I'm re-adopting the original vision of the magazine: a basic, short, cheap-to-print, and colorless publication distributed to art-centric organizations in the Boulder area. This publication will feature a few well-known writers, a guest writer, and a heap of local, philosophically inclined folk writing their perceptions of contemporary American culture. It will also be full of B&W photos. Simple, yes? Yes.
Mom, thanks for listening, you're the best.